Any opinions expressed in the following story are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the positions of anyone involved in the creation or maintenance of this web site. Information presented in the message should be considered "as observed by, and to the best knowledge of, the author", and not as a statement of fact.

Thanks to Pacesetter Corp. and their attempted legal action to shut down this site, we have now started asking each author to swear, under penalty of perjury, that everything stated in their story is true. Unfortunately, we have been unable to contact this author. However, someone seems to have posted this story on the misc.consumers.house newsgroup, and thus it can now be read there.

From:    Private
E-Mail:  Private
Subject: Love Your Website!

I'm a former Pacesetter employee who has eagerly read every word on your website. Kudos to you folks for showing the courage to fight back against these arrogant, underhanded, unethical people. Your initiative will help thousands of people avoid the heartache of dealing with these blood-sucking leeches.

Not only does the company mistreat it's customers but their employees as well. Many people in their telemarketing department have suffered thru hazings, verbal tongue lashings and undelivered promises, not to mention having to deal with a hostile environment on a daily basis. It wasn't always that way. I used to really enjoy working for Pacesetter. But, in hindsight, my experience there was anything but delightful. However, some have gained justice from Pacesetter's indiscretions as evidenced by the attached documentation from the state of Kansas Judiciary.

Please add this to your website if you feel it's appropriate.

Your discretion of not publishing my identity or email address is appreciated.

P.S. I still have contacts within the corporate hierchy at Pacesetter and know for a fact that their business has diminished greatly the past few years....could it be the best advertising is still word of mouth? Or, is it the expense of legal representation? Perhaps a combination of both.

Admin's Note: This post may have been altered from the original version to remove the sender's name and e-mail. Spelling and grammar have not been corrected.

The attached document detailed the sexual harrasment case Cadena v. Pacesetter Corporation.